WebMay 25, 2011 · According to the C# language specification found here the behavior you described should not be possible. Because under 20.4.2 Interface mapping it is said that the implementation is either explicit or mapped to a public non-static member. WebApr 24, 2016 · If this is the scenario you can only put XML comments on the interface where you describe that an abstract class must be created that implements this interface the way that the setter is protected internal. Of course it will not enforce nothing but if the developer who will implement this interface will see this note. :) – Gabor
Interfaces In C# 8.0
WebInterfaces ( interface implementations) Properties Indexers Methods Structs Classes Within each of these groups order by access: (SA1202) public internal protected internal protected private Within each of the access groups, order by static, then non-static: (SA1204) static non-static WebOct 27, 2024 · It can access private and protected members of the containing type, including any inherited protected members. In the previous declaration, the full name of class Nested is Container.Nested. This is the name used to create a new instance of the nested class, as follows: C# Container.Nested nest = new Container.Nested (); See also boots pharmacy queen margaret drive glasgow
c# - How can an interface implementation be protected? - Stack Overflow
WebJan 25, 2024 · A protected member is accessible within its class and by derived class instances. For a comparison of protected with the other access modifiers, see … WebJul 15, 2024 · When we make one method protected it is available in the inheriting interface rather than the implementing class. By default the members of the interfaces are abstract, which makes it compulsory for … WebMay 24, 2016 · An interface contains only the signatures of methods, properties, events or indexers. Interfaces cannot contain constructors. Interfaces cannot contain fields. By … hat mittens scarf